Sunday, 15 November 2009

November Book: The Great Gatsby by F.Scott Fitzgerald

The Great Gatsby

by

F.Scott Fitzgerald
(chosen by Elster)

Some background links to get you started:

Minutes October Book: Breath by Tim Winton

Breath

by Tim Winton

(chosen by CH)




CH chose this book because she couldn't believe that over a ten year period, we hadn't read any books by Tim Winton before.


Tim Winton began his first novel, An Open Swimmer (1982), at the age of 19, while on a Creative Writing course at Curtin University, Perth. It won the Australian/Vogel National Literary Award, and he has since made his living as a full-time writer. He was born in Perth in 1960, and is the author of several novels for adults. Many of his books are set in his familiar landscapes of Western Australia. He has also written books for children and collections of short stories.

Breath is his most recent novel and was winner of the 2009 Miles Franklin Award.

Tim Winton been named a Living Treasure by the National Trust, and awarded the Centenary Medal for service to literature and the community. He has lived in Greece, France and Ireland, but has now settled in Western Australia with his family.

(General biographical details from here.)

What the publisher says about the book:

More than once since then I've wondered whether the life-threatening high jinks that Loonie and I and Sando and Eva got up to in the years of my adolescence were anything more than a rebellion against the monotony of drawing breath.

Breath is a story about the wildness of youth - the lust for excitement and terror, the determination to be extraordinary, the wounds that heal and those that don't - and about learning to live with its passing.

In his first novel for seven years, Tim Winton has achieved a new level of mastery. Breath confirms him as one of the world's finest storytellers, a writer of novels that are at the same time simple and profound, relentlessly gripping and deeply moving.


What we discussed about the book:

  • The sense of place in Tim Winton’s writing. Is the location immediately recognisable? What makes it so distinctive?
  • Was Eva a believable character?
  • The impact of events in adolescence on the rest of your life.
  • What was Pikelet looking for in the relationship with Sando and Loonie? Did he get it?
  • Was the relationship between Eva and Pikelet abusive?
  • Did Eva’s risk-taking replace the thrill of the risks of her extreme sport?
  • In how many ways was ‘breath’ represented in this book: drowning, dreaming, hyperventilation, held-breath diving, sleep apnoea, asthma, didgeridoo playing, asphyxia, resuscitations, extracting oxygen from surf foam...
  • Were some of these means of fighting the natural monotony of unconscious breathing? Was it a metaphor for pushing against the monotony of life?
  • How did the non-use of quotation marks affect our reading of the book?
  • In what ways did Pikelet’s surfing exploits make his feel ‘special’?
  • Was the end of the book satisfactory?
  • Were we at times holding our breath reading some of the surfing scenes?
  • Is this a book which is more about mood than plot? The evocation of the senses? The notion of place?
  • Did we feel we were on a wave in reading the book? How had Winton created that sensation?
  • What was the purpose of the paramedic scenes? How did they enrich the plot?


And then we were sidetracked into:

  • Is surfing the only thing that men do that is both elegant and pointless?
  • How fabulous is the Panadol ad with the 70yo surfer man?
    How had the culture of surfing changed between the 1960s and the 1980s. And what about now?
  • Why was there little mention of the mechanics of Eva and Pikelet’s relationship in any of the reviews of the book we read?
  • What did we think of other endings to Tim Winton novels?
  • Why are Tim Winton books so highly acclaimed? What makes a ‘great’ book in an award sense?


In other news:

  • We sympathised with Elster over her foot injury and wished her a speedy recovery.
  • We discussed the finer details of fructose malabsorbtion.


Ratings:
Ratings average: 7.45
Ratings range:6.5 to 8

Next book: The Great Gatsby by F.Scott Fitzgerald (chosen by Elster)



    Wednesday, 14 October 2009

    October book: Breath by Tim Winton



    Breath

    by Tim Winton

    (chosen by CH)


    Some background links to get you started:


    Minutes September Book - Jasper Jones by Craig Silvey




    Jasper Jones

    by Craig Silvey

    chosen by LC





    This was LC's inaugural bookclub book choice. She admitted she chose the book before she read it (we assured her that is quite normal...heck, some Ladies have even been known to make the choice and then not read it before the meeting...).She selected it as she wanted to find something modern/contemporary. The sales assistant in Readings recommended this and said it would 'have lots to talk about'.

    Craig Silvey grew up on an orchard in Dwellingup in Western Australia. He now lives in Fremantle where at the age of 19, he wrote his first novel, Rhubarb. It was published in 2004. In 2005, Silvey won a Sydney Morning Herald Best Young Novelist Award. In 2007, Silvey released The World According To Warren, a picture book starring the guide-dog from Rhubarb. In early 2008, he completed his second novel, Jasper Jones. Silvey is also the singer/songwriter for the band The Nancy Sikes!



    (General biographical details from publisher's website)



    What the publisher says about the book:

    Late on a hot summer night in the tail end of 1965, Charlie Bucktin, a precocious and bookish boy of thirteen, is startled by an urgent knock on the window of his sleep-out. His visitor is Jasper Jones, an outcast in the regional mining town of Corrigan. Rebellious, mixed-race and solitary, Jasper is a distant figure of danger and intrigue for Charlie. So when Jasper begs for his help, Charlie eagerly steals into the night by his side, terribly afraid but desperate to impress.Jasper takes him through town and to his secret glade in the bush, and it's here that Charlie bears witness to Jasper's horrible discovery. With his secret like a brick in his belly, Charlie is pushed and pulled by a town closing in on itself in fear and suspicion as he locks horns with his tempestuous mother; falls nervously in love and battles to keep a lid on his zealous best friend, Jeffrey Lu. And in vainly attempting to restore the parts that have been shaken loose, Charlie learns to discern the truth from the myth, and why white lies creep like a curse. In the simmering summer where everything changes, Charlie learns why the truth of things is so hard to know, and even harder to hold in his heart.


    What we discussed about the book:
    • Who is the central character - Charlie or Jasper?
    • Why did Charlie help Jasper? What motivated him?
    • Why did Jasper choose Charlie?
    • The idea of the 'outsider' - how many of the characters were outsiders? What does it take to become an 'insider'?
    • Was Jeffrey Lu an outsider? What was different about his approach to life?
    • Was Charlie's voice that of a 13 year old, or an adult reflecting back on 13?
    • Is the author Charlie? Is this the town he grew up in? Or is it an extrapolation/ exaggeration of his own experiences?
    • How did the townsfolk reconcile their differences in attitude towards Jasper on and off the football field?
    • Why was it set in 1965? What was it about that era that impacts on the story (e.g. race relations during the 1960s, the Vietnam War, women's roles in society)
    • Who are the good guys and who are the bad guys in this town? Is it possible to divide on such lines?
    • Was it believable that Charlie could keep the secret? Did he realise that growing up was about keeping secrets?
    • Did Eliza intend for her father to be in the house when it burnt down?
    • The combination of comic elements and intense drama...is this a reflection of human resilience - humour in the face of tragedy?

    And then we were side-tracked into:

    • The role of sport in the social structure of a country town.
    • The role of other institutions such as schools/churches in a country town.
    • What would Jasper's life have been like if he had stayed in that town?
    • What causes outsiders to bond together - shared experiences? shared secrets?
    • Do insider/outsider groups exist in large cities? How are they identified?
    • Did the slow and leisurely pace of the book reflect the pace of life in a country town?

    In other news:

    • We discussed the resurgence of old skills and hobbies. Some people are starting mother/daughter groups to do some of these activities.
    • How you know when you have possums and rats in your roof.
    • Misinterpretation of hand symbols between cultures - the raised thumb as a sign of greeting, the Greek outstretched hand...
    • Polygamist marriages...who saw the Oprah show about them?
    • We discussed appropriate book choices to suggest to our blog friend Dee from Fort Wayne, Indiana and thought maybe The Secret River by Kate Grenville (an Australian author, but the book can be obtained through amazon.com or bookdepository.co.uk)
    • Domestic Goddess held our incredulous attention as she described her cataloguing procedure for pairs of pantyhose (into zip lock labelled plastic bags): excellent, medium, ones for skirts or boots, unusuals, only to be worn under jeans....
    • ...which led to a discussion about the 101 uses for an old pair of pantyhose: packaging jigsaw puzzles, cleaning wood panelling, cleaning flyscreens, tying up tomato plants...

    Ratings:

    Ratings range: 4 to 9

    Ratings average: 7.66

    Next Book: Breath by Tim Winton (Chosen by CH)

    Monday, 14 September 2009

    September Book: Jasper Jones by Craig Silvey



    Jasper Jones

    by Craig Silvey

    (chosen by LC)











    Some background links to get you started:

    Minutes August Book: The Gargoyle

    The Gargoyle


    by Andrew Davidson


    (Chosen by KM)


    KM chose this book on the recommendation of 'the good doctor' - her GP with whom she often discusses bookclub choices. The GP has a great track record of suggestion books to read.

    Andrew Davidson was born in Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada and graduated in 1995 from the University of British Columbia with a B.A. in English literature. He has worked as a teacher in Japan, where he has lived on and off, and as a writer of English lessons for Japanese websites. The Gargoyle, the product of seven years' worth of research and composition, is his first book. Davidson lives in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

    (General biographical details from publisher's website.)

    What the publisher says about the book:

    The narrator of The Gargoyle is a very contemporary cynic, physically beautiful and sexually adept, who dwells in the moral vacuum that is modern life. As the book opens, he is driving along a dark road when he is distracted by what seems to be a flight of arrows. He crashes into a ravine and suffers horrible burns over much of his body. As he recovers in a burn ward, undergoing the tortures of the damned, he awaits the day when he can leave the hospital and commit carefully planned suicide—for he is now a monster in appearance as well as in soul.

    A beautiful and compelling, but clearly unhinged, sculptress of gargoyles by the name of Marianne Engel appears at the foot of his bed and insists that they were once lovers in medieval Germany. In her telling, he was a badly injured mercenary and she was a nun and scribe in the famed monastery of Engelthal who nursed him back to health. As she spins their tale in Scheherazade fashion and relates equally mesmerizing stories of deathless love in Japan, Iceland, Italy, and England, he finds himself drawn back to life—and, finally, in love. He is released into Marianne's care and takes up residence in her huge stone house. But all is not well. For one thing, the pull of his past sins becomes ever more powerful as the morphine he is prescribed becomes ever more addictive. For another, Marianne receives word from God that she has only twenty-seven sculptures left to complete—and her time on earth will be finished.

    Already an international literary sensation, The Gargoyle is an Inferno for our time. It will have you believing in the impossible.



    What we discussed about the book:

    • The graphic description of the burn treatment process. To what extent did we feel his suffering and his sense of despair?
    • The number of events in the story that were linked to Good Friday. What was the significance of that?
    • What was the snake? Was it self-doubt? A conscience? Was it addiction?
    • Did Marianne have a mental illness? Was she bipolar? Or was she really 700 years old?
    • Was the entire story an hallucination while he was in a drug-induced coma following the accident?
    • In what ways were the 'parables' linked and how did they progress the plot.
    • Was the purpose of the parable-stories to bring to the main character an understanding of the nature of love?
    • What WAS the main character's name?
    • How effective was the journey through hell as a representation of withdrawal from drug addiction?
    • What was the role of the food feasts that Marianne would bring into the hospital?
    • Why did the main character have a background in the pornography industry? In what way did that create the character?
    • The purpose of the arrow imagery throughout the book.
    Then we were sidetracked into:

    • Did anyone cry reading this book? What does it take in a book to make each of us cry?
    • How the first letter of each of the chapters spells out: 'All things in a single book bound by love' (Dante) and the last letter of each chapter spells out: 'Die Liebe is strak wie der Tod Marianne.' Is this just too clever and tricky an element? Or does it add to our understanding of the story?
    • How would you describe the genre of this book? Is it magic realism?
    • How each of the parables was balanced on a combination of elements: air/earth/water/fire. Each of the characters lived by one and died by one.
    • The links between the nuns' names who nursed the burn victim and the contemporary nurses' names: Mathildis/Maddie, Elisabeth/Beth, Constantia/Connie.
    • Was the last chapter a little too 'Hollywood' in tying up the ends? Would we have preferred a different ending point?

    And in other news...

    • We discussed how various schools view the taking of holidays during school term.
    • The value of ordering books from http://www.bookdepository.co.uk/ (no postage fees)
    • Would we swap meals with a stranger?
    • The impact of Crackberries on family/worklife balance. Is it impolite to continue to check it at another person's house if they've asked you not to? Is it impolite to ask them in the first place?
    • And we wondered how many times EXACTLY we've heard the story about how RR was the only one to read Gypsy's book.
    • EDITED TO ADD: KM brought along some delicious Bougatsa (like the dog in the book) for us to try!

    Ratings:

    Ratings average: 7.85

    Ratings range: 4 to 9

    Next book: Jasper Jones by Craig Silvey (LC's choice)

    Saturday, 15 August 2009

    August book: The Gargoyle by Andrew Davidson



    The Gargoyle

    by Andrew Davidson

    (chosen by KM)



    Some background links to get you started:

    Minutes July Book: The Book of Emmett by Deborah Forster


    The Book of Emmett
    by Deborah Forster
    (Chosen by KE)
    KE chose this book after seeing an article about it in The Age which highlighted "the inventiveness of the telling". She was particularly interested to see whether the book would examine the possibility of changing behaviours between generations, thus breaking ongoing inherited cycles of dysfunction.
    Deborah Foster grew up in Footscray, Melbourne. She worked as a staff and freelance journalist for many years and was a This Life columnist on The Age and The Sunday Age. Deborah Foster is married to Alan Kohler and they have three children. The Book of Emmett is her first novel.
    (general biographical detail from the publisher's website.)
    What the publisher says about the book:
    Emmett Brown is as dark as Heathcliff, and as unpredictable. Sometimes he's an inspiration, but not often. He's a man of booze and obsessions: one of them is his 'System', an attempt to bend the laws of probability. But when the lottery numbers and horses fail him, so do love and reason, and he becomes an ogre to his wife and children.

    For the innocents - Louisa, Rob, Peter, Daniel and Jessie - the bonds formed hiding in hedges at the end of the street, waiting for the maelstroms to pass, are complex and unbreakable. Over the years, the consequences of Emmett's rages shape both their spirits and psyches, but as he lies dying they discover that love - however imperfect - is the best defence against pain. The Book of Emmett is a novel about hope and love and surviving.
    What we discussed about the book:
    • Who was the real Emmett? How did he appear in the eyes of the children?
    • Did the occasional softness he showed (the encyclopedias, taking them to the ballet) make it difficult for the children to hate him?
    • To what extent did we feel this was a memoir as opposed to totally fiction? Did we think Louisa was representative of the author?
    • If an author denies that a novel is autobiographical, are we able to accept that is is totally fiction? Does it matter?
    • To what extent was this a novel "entirely about forgiveness and hope" (Quote from Deborah Forster)
    • How affected were we by the graphic nature of some of the scenes?
    • In what ways did the texture and beauty of the language Forster employed heighten our experience of the story?
    • What did we think about Ann (the mother). What were her options in that time and culture? Why don't we know more about her back story?
    • In what ways did Ann protect her children, or minimise the impact on them?
    • How did their upbringing impact differently on each of the children?
    And then we were sidetracked into:
    • Is it possible to break cycles between generations? or is it inevitable that history repeats?
    • How resilient children are to rise above their domestic situations. Why do some children carry issues into adulthood and others don't?
    • Deborah Forster was 53 when this novel was published. She was inspired by Olga Masters whose first piece of fiction was published at 63, and Elizabeth Jolley who published her first novel at 53. Is there hope in this for all of us?!
    • How important it is to have at least one significant adult in your childhood to steer you on the right path (teachers, friends, grandparents, godparents)
    • The importance of mentors in achieving better outcomes...not just in times of adversity.
    • Will children always love their parents no matter how badly they behave?
    • Is it easier to resolve issues by remaining in an abusive environment than it is by leaving?
    And in other news we discussed:
    • Breath tests for fructose intolerance, epiglottis malfunctions, reflux and vomiting....
    • Could we last 21 days without complaining?
    • Who would ask their partners to return two excess brackets to the hardware store for a refund of $4 and who wouldn't.
    • The differences in ethnic and cultural attitudes to looking after the older generation.
    • Skype. As one No.1 Lady stated, "It's better with a camera, but you need to get dressed."
    • Approaches to pocket money for children. Should they work for it? Is it a reward or a right? Can they spend it however they like?
    • The current focus in the media on violence in the city at night. Have youth become desensitised to violence through exposure to TV, films and computer games?
    Ratings:
    Ratings range: 7 to 9 (lowest score was a DNF)
    Ratings average: 8.25
    Next book: The Gargoyle by Andrew Davidson (chosen by KM)

    Monday, 20 July 2009

    July book: The Book of Emmett



    The Book of Emmett

    by Deborah Forster

    (chosen by KE)





    Some background links to get you started:

    Minutes June Book: The Slap by Christos Tsiolkas


    The Slap
    by Christos Tsiolkas
    (Chosen by Domestic Goddess)










    Domestic Goddess chose this book so that she could (in her own words) "maintain her record of picking sh*tty books." She introduced the discussion of the book with a disclaimer that she was in no way related to the author or the publishers. She had no personal links to the book, and therefore No.1 Ladies should not apologise for not liking the book, or for having critical views of it.

    More seriously however, she explained that she had chosen the book after reading some rave reviews of it and hearing excellent word-of-mouth recommendations. Reading the blurb on the back cover, she was intrigued by the concept.


    Christos Tsiolkas is the son of Greek migrants, and was born in Melbourne in 1965. He grew up in a predominantly Greek inner city suburb of Melbourne. He has an Arts degree from the University of Melbourne and has worked as a writer, artist and film maker.

    His first novel Loaded was published in 1995. (It was later made into a film, Head On.) His next novel The Jesus Man was published in 1999, followed by the critically acclaimed novel Dead Europe in 2005. The Slap was published in 2008 and has reached bestseller status.

    While writing The Slap, Tsiolkas began working as a veterinary nurse. He lives in Melbourne with his partner of 24 years.


    (general biographical detail from First Tuesday Book Club.)


    What the publisher says about the book:

    At a suburban barbecue, a man slaps a child who is not his own. This event has a shocking ricochet effect on a group of people, mostly friends, who are directly or indirectly influenced by the event. In this remarkable novel, Christos Tsiolkas turns his unflinching and all-seeing eye onto that which connects us all: the modern family and domestic life in the twenty-first century. The Slap is told from the points of view of eight people who were present at the barbecue. The slap and its consequences force them all to question their own families and the way they live, their expectations, beliefs and desires.What unfolds is a powerful, haunting novel about love, sex and marriage, parenting and children, and the fury and intensity - all the passions and conflicting beliefs - that family can arouse. In its clear-eyed and forensic dissection of the ever-growing middle class and its aspirations and fears, The Slap is also a poignant, provocative novel about the nature of loyalty and happiness, compromise and truth.

    What we discussed about the book:
    • What were the overriding themes of this book: parenting, love and sex, fury and violence, family values, suburbia, class, loyalty, drugs, fidelity, youth...?
    • Did any of the characters have warm aspects? Did we empathise with any of them?
    • Was it difficult to keep track of the characters as they moved through the plot?
    • The actual slap: was it a retaliation or protection of his own child?
    • The language used was very abrasive and 'in your face' - did this alienate us as readers? Were we offended?
    • Was the language one-noted? Did we find any diffentiation in the voices of the characters?
    • Was there any degree of intimacy in any of the sexual relationships? Was the behaviour credible for 40-something year olds or did it seem adolescent?
    • Was the sex in this book, "man-sex"? Blokey? Lacking in gentle intimacy? Was it erotic?
    • Were the characters (particularly Harry) in any way self-reflective? Was there any growth as a result of the events?
    • What did the No.1 Ladies of Greek heritage think about the portrayal of Greek-Australians in this book - particularly the men? Was Koula's behaviour acceptable? Was Aisha disrespectful of Manoli?
    • Was longterm breastfeeding used as a device to make Rosie unlikeable? Was this fair?
    • What were Gary and Rosie's responsibilities in the bbq/slap event? Did they meet their responsibilities?
    • Did we think any of the characters were a reflection of the author himself? Anouk? Nick?
    • Could we relate to any of the characters?

    And then we were sidetracked into:
    • Is this book "a satanic version of Neighbours"?
    • In what ways was this a political comment on "Howard's middle class"?
    • What is the "middle class"? Is it easily defined in 21st century Australia?
    • Were we tricked by the set-up of the slap at the beginning of the book into expecting something different from what the book delivered?
    • How different would this book have been if Harry did not have a history of domestic violence and had been an otherwise reasonable man who on this one occasion had crossed the line?
    • What are the rights of children? Are children as adequately protected from emotional/verbal abuse as they are from physical abuse?
    • In what ways can children's rights and adults' responsibilities come into conflict?
    • What is it about Perth that disconnected characters in novels (e.g. Aisha, Rosie) often come from Perth? Is the distance used to create that sense of disconnection?
    • Why does this book win so many awards and critical acclaim?
    • Was this book just TOO MUCH?
    And in other news we discussed:
    • How many of us read births and obituraries in the newspaper? We discussed the Greek-Australian tradition of reading the funeral notices regularly.
    • The Greek inability to say the word, "cancer". Instead it is called "kakia" - the bad one/ the bad disease.
    • There was much hilarity among the Greek No.1 Ladies when it was suggested that your brother-in-law's father-in-law is a distant relation...apparently that is not the case at all. That is a close relation.
    • CH announced that, after 17 years with the one employer she has resigned. Her employers were suitably disappointed. Initially, she will be taking time off to spend with the kids - from whom she has asked for some performance criteria to measure her progress against!
    Ratings:

    Pre-discussion ratings range: 0 to 8
    Post-discussion ratings range: 0 to 6.5
    Pre-discussion ratings average: 5.2
    Post-discussion ratings average: 4.7


    Next book: The Book of Emmett by Deborah Forster (chosen by KE)

    Saturday, 13 June 2009

    June book: The Slap by Christos Tsiolkas

    The Slap

    by Christos Tsiolkas

    (chosen by Domestic Goddess)












    Some background links to get you started:

    Minutes May Book: The White Tiger





    The White Tiger by Aravind Adiga

    (Chosen by T-Rex)




    T-Rex chose this book because it attracted her attention when it won the Man Booker Prize in 2008, and she then watched it sitting in the bestseller lists for weeks.

    Aravind Adiga was born in Madras (now Chennai) in 1974 . He grew up in Mangalore and studied at Canara High School, then at St. Aloysius High School. After emigrating to Sydney, Australia, with his family, he studied at James Ruse Agricultural High School. He studied English literature at Columbia College, Columbia University in New York, and also studied at Magdalen College, Oxford

    Adiga began his journalistic career as a financial journalist, interning at the Financial Times. He was subsequently hired by TIME, where he remained a South Asia correspondent for three years before going freelance. During his freelance period, he wrote The White Tiger. He currently lives in Mumbai, India.

    The White Tiger is his debut novel and won the 2008 Booker Prize. He is the fourth Indian-born author to win the prize, after Salman Rushdie, Arundhati Roy and Kiran Desai.

    (general biographical detail from Wikipedia)

    What the publisher says about the book:

    Introducing a major literary talent, The White Tiger offers a story of coruscating wit, blistering suspense, and questionable morality, told by the most volatile, captivating, and utterly inimitable narrator that this millennium has yet seen.

    Balram Halwai is a complicated man. Servant. Philosopher. Entrepreneur. Murderer. Over the course of seven nights, by the scattered light of a preposterous chandelier, Balram tells us the terrible and transfixing story of how he came to be a success in life -- having nothing but his own wits to help him along.

    Born in the dark heart of India, Balram gets a break when he is hired as a driver for his village's wealthiest man, two house Pomeranians (Puddles and Cuddles), and the rich man's (very unlucky) son. From behind the wheel of their Honda City car, Balram's new world is a revelation. While his peers flip through the pages of Murder Weekly ("Love -- Rape -- Revenge!"), barter for girls, drink liquor (Thunderbolt), and perpetuate the Great Rooster Coop of Indian society, Balram watches his employers bribe foreign ministers for tax breaks, barter for girls, drink liquor (single-malt whiskey), and play their own role in the Rooster Coop. Balram learns how to siphon gas, deal with corrupt mechanics, and refill and resell Johnnie Walker Black Label bottles (all but one). He also finds a way out of the Coop that no one else inside it can perceive.

    Balram's eyes penetrate India as few outsiders can: the cockroaches and the call centers; the prostitutes and the worshippers; the ancient and Internet cultures; the water buffalo and, trapped in so many kinds of cages that escape is (almost) impossible, the white tiger. And with a charisma as undeniable as it is unexpected, Balram teaches us that religion doesn't create virtue, and money doesn't solve every problem -- but decency can still be found in a corrupt world, and you can get what you want out of life if you eavesdrop on the right conversations.

    Sold in sixteen countries around the world, The White Tiger recalls The Death of Vishnu and Bangkok 8 in ambition, scope, and narrative genius, with a mischief and personality all its own. Amoral, irreverent, deeply endearing, and utterly contemporary, this novel is an international publishing sensation -- and a startling, provocative debut.


    What we discussed about the book:


    • Is this a political book? Can a book which deals with issues of class and society be anything but political?
    • Is this a particularly insightful book for a writer of such a young age (he is in his 30s)
    • The impact of the writing about the water of the Ganges. The way in which the writing evoked response on a number of levels.
    • The use of the rooster analogy throughout the book. What was the purpose and effect?
    • The issue of the disrespect Balram showed his family - is this credible? Was it that he needed to show this disrespect and lack of tradition in order for his story to work? Was he the only one who would have done so?
    • What we thought has happened to his family in the end.
    • Did Balram have a conscience?
    • Did the language within the book change as he challenged the status quo...in what ways did the language create a sense of chaos and disruption?
    • In what ways did the device of using the letters to the Chairman to tell the story influence the language used?
    • Comparing the method of dealing with Miss Pinky's driving accident and that of Balram's employee later in the book - what did that tell us about each group's values and behaviour?
    • Did the end justify the means? If Balram had just stolen the money but not killed, would that have been acceptable? Where do we draw the lines on behaviour?
    • Did Ashok get corrupted by his environment?
    • What did Balram mean when he said the power of the world would be in the browns and the yellows? Do what extent is this true?

    And then we were sidetracked into:

    • Does a power imbalance corrupt even the best of intentions?
    • Are the Indian domestic classes "invisible"? (i.e. mentions in the book of them standing against the wall, almost unseen etc)
    • Democracy vs communism...is there ever a possibility of a perfect society? In what ways do human foibles undermine any attempts?
    • Would we prefer to be poor in India, or poor in China?
    • CH's experience of reading this book while on holiday in India and her experience of seeing a country consisting of of two worlds.
    • Did Slumdog Millionaire glamorise India?
    • How is it possible within any society for 1 percent of the population to force the remaining 99 per cent to live in servitude?
    • Tensions in developing nations between a rapidly rising middle class and the working class supporting them.
    • Is the vitilago that is mentioned often in the book the same condition Michael Jackson claims to have?

    And in other news we discussed:

    • Whether judges and lawyers found guilty of criminal charges should face a greater sentence than the average man/woman.
    • The blinging flash from the bling across the room, as we celebrated T-Rex's impending marriage.
    • Should you be charged extra for a blow dry when you get your hair cut?
    • Clothing manufacturing sweatshops. How do you know whether retailers are using suppliers who have sweatshops or not?
    • The price of jeans. Are comfort and price inversely proportional?
    • How amazing it was to have an ABSOLUTE FULL HOUSE at bookclub - possibly for the first time in around nine years. And not only that, everyone had read AND finished the book. Gold stars all round!

    Ratings:

    Ratings range: 8 to 9

    Ratings average: 8.45

    Next book: The Slap by Christos Tsoilkas (chosen by Domestic Goddess)

    Saturday, 16 May 2009

    May book: The White Tiger by Aravind Adiga

    May book: The White Tiger
    by Aravind Adiga


    (chosen by T-Rex)






    Some background links to get you started:

    Minutes April book: Speeches that Changed the World


    Minutes April book: Speeches that Changed the World with intro by Simon Sebag Montefiore

    (chosen by JM)




    JM chose this book on the suggestion of a former No.1 Melbourne Ladies Bookclub member now residing in the wild West (JL). JL had said that it looked fantastic. She hadn't actually read it herself - but this is from a bookclub member who once chose the month's book (Dingo: The Story of Our Mob by Ernie Dingo) and then turned up to the discussion meeting having not actually read it herself...so we completely understood!

    JM was intrigued by the idea of placing some of those famous lines from speeches into their original context by reading the full text of the speeches.

    Simon Sebag Montefiore wrote the introduction to this book. He was born in 1965, educated at Harrow School and read history at Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge University.

    He is the award-winning author of the bestselling books Young Stalin, Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar and Catherine the Great & Potemkin.His new novel, Sashenka, published under the name 'Simon Montefiore', has been sold in 14 languages including Russian.

    His next history book is Jerusalem: the Biography, a fresh history of the Middle East. He has recently selected his heroes from history, published as 'Heroes: History's Greatest Men and Women' and his anti-heroes published as Monsters: History's Most Evil Men and Women.

    Montefiore is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature, and lives in London with his wife, the novelist Santa Montefiore, and their two children.


    (General biographical detail from
    Simon Sebag Montefiore's own website)

    What the publisher says about this book:

    Over 50 of the world's greatest speeches, the stories behind them and biographies of each speaker, including: Elizabeth I; Charles I; Oliver Cromwell; George Washington; Napolean; Emmeline Pankhurst; Marie Curie; Mahatma Gandhi; Stalin; Winston Churchill; Charles de Gaulle; John F Kennedy; Martin Luther King; Mother Teresa; Nelson Mandela; and many others from throughout history whose words have motivated, given hope to and sometimes terrified those who heard them.

    Inspiring and thought-provoking, Speeches that Changed the World provides a unique perspective on the major turning points in history.

    What we discussed about the book:
    • What was Simon Sebag Montefiore's role in the book? Was it purely the writing of the introduction? (Earlier editions do not contain his intro.) Was it just a marketing ploy to use his name to promote the anonymously compiled and edited book?
    • Why were some of the speeches chosen?
    • Did ever speech 'change the world'?
    • What constitutes a 'great speech' - is it the content, or the delivery?
    • How different is it to read words on paper that are intended to be received aurally?
    • Did we listen to the CD provided with the book? In what ways did that enhance our understanding of the speeches?
    • Was there too much or too little introductory information for each speech?
    • Would we have liked more analysis of the aftermath of the delivery of each speech?
    • Why were so many of the speeches by lawyers?
    • Did we think there were omissions of content - eg the Labour Movement/8 hour day movement?
    • Was this a book targeted at high school students?
    • What is the role of speechwriters? Should they be acknowledged, or does the giver of the speech ultimately 'own' the words?
    And then we were sidetracked into:
    • Do speeches need to be heard in context to have the effect intended?
    • With hindsight, how differently do we interpret words spoken years earlier?
    • If Simon Sebag Montefiore didn't have anything to do with the editing of the book what benefit is there in writing an introduction and having your name associated with it? Is it purely a commercial transaction? Does it add to your 'brand' as an author?
    • Has modern media and the age of the soundbite changed the way speeches are written?
    • Do modern audiences have less tolerance for long-winded orations?
    • Can you teach the skill of good oration or is it something people are born with?
    • What would we include in a volume entitled, "Speeches that Changed Australia?" (e.g Rudd's Sorry day speech, Whitlam's dismissal speech, Menzies announcing war, Keating's victory speech.) What ones by non-politicians would we include?
    • How do you use silence in a speech for effect?
    In other news:
    • We discussed GPS systems and whether the voices could be any more annoying.
    • Does Australia need a new standardised system of clothing sizing - how does 'Country Road' sizing compare with department store sizing?
    • Who remembered the community service announcements that ran on Channel Nine TV in Perth in the 1970s/80s? Vitamins and Minerals, Mum Knows , Dingalings do Stupid Things, and Dirt & Germs. (Click on the links to watch them on YouTube - ahhhhh for the days when mums were so revered!)
    Ratings:
    Ratings range: 6 to 8
    Ratings average: 6.81


    Next book: The White Tiger by Aravind Adiga (chosen by T-Rex)

    Sunday, 19 April 2009

    April Book: Speeches that Changed the World with intro by Simon Sebag Montefiore


    April Book: Speeches that Changed the World
    with intro by Simon Sebag Montefiore


    (chosen by JM)




    Some background links to get you started:

    Minutes March Book: People of the Book by Geraldine Brooks



    Minutes March Book: People of the Book
    by Geraldine Brooks

    (chosen by Gypsy)






    Gypsy chose this book as she had already read it and thought it a worthy bookclub read. In a completely transparent grab for popularity, she confessed she thought it was ‘worthy of some 10s’!

    We worked out that this is the third of Geraldine Brooks’ books that we have read in the 10 years of the No.1 Melbourne Ladies’ Bookclub.

    Geraldine Brooks is an Australian-born author and journalist who grew up in the Western suburbs of Sydney. She worked as a reporter for The Sydney Morning Herald for three years as a feature writer with a special interest in environmental issues.

    In 1982 she won a scholarship to the journalism masters program at Columbia University in New York City and later worked for The Wall Street Journal.

    She was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in fiction in 2006 for her novel March. Her first novel, Year of Wonders, is an international bestseller. People of the Book is translated into 20 languages. She, her husband and their two sons divide their time between homes in Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, and Sydney, Australia.

    (biographical details sourced from the Author’s official website)

    What the publisher says about the book:



    When Hanna Heath gets a call in the middle of the night in her Sydney home about a precious medieval manuscript that has been recovered from the smouldering ruins of war−torn Sarajevo‚ she knows she is on the brink of the experience of a lifetime.

    A renowned book conservator‚ she must now make her way to Bosnia to start work on restoring the Sarajevo Haggadah −− a Jewish prayer book −− to discover its secrets and piece together the story of its miraculous survival. But the trip will also set in motion a series of events that threaten to rock Hanna′s orderly life‚ including her encounter with Ozren Karamen‚ the young librarian who risked his life to save the book.

    As meticulously researched as all of Brooks′ previous work‚ People of the Book is a gripping and moving novel about war‚ art‚ love and survival.

    What we discussed about the book:


    • Did the structure of the novel work for us? What was the effect of unfolding the historical narrative in reverse chronological order, while the contemporary story moved forward?
    • To what extent did the novel explore the concept of human frailty?
    • Was there a theme of destructive and dysfunctional fathering within all the female characters in the book?
    • How plausible did we find Hannah Heath as a character? What was the intent of her seemingly out-of-character ‘ockerisms’ of speech at times?
    • How compelling did we find the contemporary story in comparison with the historical stories?
    • Was the contemporary story the human drama of The Book in today’s world – could it conceivably takes its place as one of the stories of The Book if the novel was set 100 years into the future?
    • Were there too many conveniences and coincidences in the plot?
    • The skill it take to start with an item such as the image of the Moorish woman at the table and then create an entire story from that spanning hundreds of years and many cultures and countries.
    • What were the links within the novel to true stories?
    • What did the novel have to say about cultures and religions co-existing peacefully?
    And then we were sidetracked into:


    • What is a codex?
    • Do books such as these need a glossary for us to fully enjoy them? Is that our own responsibility to look things up?
    And in other news:

    • We discussed JMs recent 40th party – and she handed out huge blocks of parmesan as party bags!
    • We analysed the appeal of the TV show Ladette to Lady. Why is it so strangely compelling?
    • We admired KE’s photobook from her trip over Christmas.
    Ratings:

    Ratings range: 7.5 to 9
    Ratings average: 8.14
    (three DNFs, one chose not to score)

    Next book: Speeches that Changed the World edited by Simon Sebag Montefiore

    Monday, 16 March 2009

    March book: The People of the Book



    People of the Book

    by Geraldine Brooks







    Some background information links to get you started:

    Wednesday, 18 February 2009

    Minutes February Book: Diary of a Bad Year by J.M Coetzee



    Minutes February Book: Diary of a Bad Year by J.M Coetzee


    (chosen by Fairlie)








    I have to confess to choosing this book somewhat hastily. A colleague recommended it. After flicking through a few pages and with no further research, I signed it up as my choice for this year. What appealed to me was the challenge of reading a book with an obvious degree of difficulty – the split stories running across the pages would, I thought, challenge our assumptions about how to read a book.

    J. M. Coetzee was the first author to win the Booker Prize twice and was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2003. His work includes Waiting for the Barbarians, Life and Times of Michael K, The Master of Petersburg, Disgrace and Inner Workings. He lives in Adelaide.
    (biographical details sourced from Text Publishing’s website)

    What the publisher says about the book:


    A famous writer is commissioned to contribute to a book of essays called Strong opinions when he meets a young woman who lives in his apartment tower. He asks
    her to become his...
    ... ... ... ... ...
    In the laundry room of her apartment block a young woman makes the acquaintance of an ageing writer. She agrees to type up his opinions, although she is aware that what he really desires...
    ... ... ... ... ...
    The young woman's boyfriend starts to spy on his neighbour and hatches a jealous plot to...

    J. M. Coetzee's Diary of a Bad Year is about loneliness, friendship and the possibility of love. It takes the reader from Australian democracy to Guantanamo Bay, from the meaning of dishonour to the creative truth of dreams. Enthralling, unexpected and deeply moving, this may be the most original work of fiction to appear this year.**


    What we discussed about the book:
    • How did we read the book? Some read each story until the dot, then read the next story until the same dot etc. Others read down each page. Some read each story in its entirety before starting the next one. Some needed three bookmarks to keep up with where they were up to.
    • Is this book fact? Is it fiction? To what degree are the opinions expressed in the essays the opinions of JM Coeztee? How much can we trust these opinions? Does it matter?
    • Was there a hierarchy to the stories on each page?
    • In what ways was it a ‘bad year’?
    • Could we hear the voice of the character ‘Senor C’ in the academic writing?
    • What was the point of the second diary?
    • To what degree does the writer mock his own opinions?
    • Is this a book about dying? Is it the book of a man saying goodbye?
    • To what degree was the JS Bach essay intended to make us reflect on this writing being like a piece of music – each of the storylines the part of a different instrument.
    • Could the book only be completely appreciated once all the parts had intertwined and played out to their end?

    And then we were sidetracked into:
    • The political situation in South Africa. To what degree has that history influenced JM Coetzee’s writing?
    • Do we enjoy books that challenge to look at writing in a new way? Were we able to accept the non-linear narrative style of this book?

    And in other news:

    • We reflected on the tragic events of recent days in Victoria with the bushfires.
    • We acknowledged that this meeting marked the 10 year anniversary of the No.1 Melbourne Ladies’ Bookclub and we agreed to plan some events to celebrate this during the year.
    • We discussed the Twilight series of books...and how addictive they are for mothers of tweenage girls...

    Ratings:

    Ratings range: 6 to 9
    Ratings average: 7.55
    (one DNF was a midrange score)

    Next book: The People of the Book by Geraldine Brooks

    Wednesday, 31 December 2008

    Books read in 2008

    The Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger

    In Defence of Food by Michael Pollan

    Water for Elephants by Sara Gruen

    The Mitford Girls by Mary S. Lovell

    Love in the Time of Cholera by Gabriel Garcia Marquez

    The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas by John Boyne

    Notes from an Exhibition by Patrick Gale

    The Secret River by Kate Grenville

    What is the What by Dave Eggers

    The Road by Cormac McCarthy

    Friday, 21 November 2008

    Minutes November Book: The Time Traveler’s Wife by Audrey Niffenegger


    Minutes November Book: The Time Traveler’s Wife by Audrey Niffenegger

    (chosen by Domestic Goddess)


    Domestic Goddess chose this book because she wanted something uplifting. She liked the science-fiction aspect to it, combined with a love story.

    Audrey Niffenegger is an artist and a professor at the Columbia College Chicago Center for Book and paper Arts, where she teaches writing, letterpress printing, and fine edition book production. She is in her thirties. The Time Traveler's Wife is her first novel.

    (biographical details sourced from readinggroupguides.com)

    What the publisher says about the book:

    This extraordinary, magical novel is the story of Clare and Henry who have known each other since Clare was six and Henry was thirty-six, and were married when Clare was twenty-two and Henry thirty. Impossible but true, because Henry is one of the first people diagnosed with Chrono-Displacement Disorder: periodically his genetic clock resets and he finds himself pulled suddenly into his past or future. His disappearances are spontaneous and his experiences are alternately harrowing and amusing. The Time Traveler's Wife depicts the effects of time travel on Henry and Clare's passionate love for each other with grace and humour. Their struggle to lead normal lives in the face of a force they can neither prevent nor control is intensely moving and entirely unforgettable.
    What we discussed about the book:

    • The non-linear nature of the book. How did we read it? Were we able to rationalise the interlocking time-frames?
    • Was Henry’s violence a survival mechanism? Did his lack of clothing highlight his vulnerability?
    • Did the book “transport and transfix “us?
    • Why did stress seem to trigger the time travel?
    • In what ways did the time-travel explore different perspectives on Clare and Henry’s relationship?
    • Is this science-fiction? What constitutes science-fiction?
    And then we were sidetracked into:
    • How would the ability to time-travel alter your perspective on events?
    • Would the ability to time travel be a curse? Knowing things but being powerless to change them.
    And in other news:
    • Is the Thermomix the eight wonder of the world?
    • How many of us admit to having watched Bold and the Beautiful, Days of our Lives and/or The Young and the Restless at some point in our lives? And how easy is it to pick the storyline right up again after 10 years break?
    Ratings:

    Ratings range: 5 to 10
    Ratings average: 7.44
    (three DNFs were the lowest three marks)

    Next book: Diary of a Bad Year by J.M Coetzee

    Saturday, 15 November 2008

    November book: The Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger



    The Time Traveler's Wife
    by Audrey Niffenegger

    (Chosen by Domestic Goddess)



    Some background links to get you started:

    Wednesday, 12 November 2008

    Minutes October Book: In Defence of Food by Michael Pollan



    Minutes October Book: In Defence of Food by Michael Pollan

    (chosen by Fairlie)


    In memory of our friend, S



    Fairlie chose this book because she heard Michael Pollan speak at the Sydney Writers Festival and he was very impressive. He has a science/journalism background and as a result has done a lot of research into nutrition. Fairlie saw and heard him speak another time (also at the Writers Festival) and this clinched it for her - it was a book for her bookclub!

    Michael Pollan is the author, most recently, of In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto. His previous book, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals (2006), was named one of the ten best books of 2006 by the New York Times and the Washington Post. He is also the author of The Botany of Desire: A Plant's-Eye View of the World (2001); A Place of My Own (1997); and Second Nature (1991). A contributing writer to the New York Times Magazine, Pollan is the recipient of numerous journalistic awards. Pollan served for many years as executive editor of Harper's Magazine and is now the Knight Professor of Science and Environmental Journalism at UC Berkeley. His articles have been anthologized in Best American Science Writing (2004); Best American Essays (1990 and 2003) and the Norton Book of Nature Writing. He lives in the Bay Area with his wife, the painter Judith Belzer, and their son, Isaac.
    (biographical details sourced from the author's website.)

    What the publisher says about the book:

    "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." These simple words go to the heart of Michael Pollan's In Defence of Food. Humans used to know how to eat well, Pollan argues. But the balanced dietary lessons that were once passed down through generations have been confused, complicated, and distorted by food industry marketers, nutritional scientists, and journalists – all of whom have much to gain from our dietary confusion. Indeed, real food is fast disappearing from the marketplace, to be replaced by "nutrients," and plain old eating by an obsession with nutrition that is, paradoxically, ruining our health, not to mention our meals. Michael Pollan's bracing and eloquent manifesto shows us how we might start making thoughtful food choices that will enrich our lives and our palates and enlarge our sense of what it means to be healthy.


    What we discussed about the book:
    • The message of the book was simple and it was not rocket science - we knew or suspected the message but having it in black and white really brought it home.
    • When you take out all of the fat in foods what do you put back in?
    • Is what manufacturers put back in "good" for human consumption?
    • Food lobbying - is it as strong in Australia as in USA and other countries?
    • Is corn syrup in everything?
    • Why has the meat industry changed so dramatically in Australia in last 5 yrs - with increased use of antibiotics and hormones?
    • National Heart Foundation health tick - what do companies have to do (or not do) to get the tick?
    • Upsizing of meals - is this tied to commodity prices? Are supermarkets downsizing their packaging whilst increasing price of manufactured food items?
    • Lengthy discussion regarding full fat (yogurt, cheese etc) versus skim or low fat products and number of eggs that are now considered healthy in daily diet.
    • Chemical processes to produce powdered egg or a substitute product (eg fruit flavours) - is it as healthy as using fresh egg or fruits in manufactured products? Does this apply to whole host of other products - eg milk, yogurt?
    • Are we losing our sense of community due to shopping in supermarkets - no longer knowing local butcher, baker etc?
    • Are the range of products available in Australia declining? Is this a positive development? Is it squeezing smaller (perhaps organic focused) manufacturers out of the market?
    And then we were sidetracked into:
    • Are the burgers really bigger and tastier at Hungry Jacks'?
    • What sort of food colouring and "make up" for the food do advertisers (via professional food stylists) use in those gorgeous photos of succulent food?

    And in other news:

    • Muck up days - why was a whole Yr 12 Grade suspended at a prominent boys school in Melbourne?
    • Boarding school in Perth - one member reminisced about a headmistress who had a really strict view of life and really enforced the rules but deep down had a soft spot in her heart.
    • We discussed the rumour that there may be a document dating back to the late 90s regarding the "rules" of our bookclub. Some members will search their archives and report back - this drew great peels of laughter....and led us into a discussion that there may also be a "briefing document" that was provided to one new member with a run down of the personalities of other members!
    • Type 2 diabetes - explanation of the difference between this and Type 1. Symptoms - thirsty, loss of concentration, tiredness. We had a look at an insulin kit and explanation of what a person with Type 2 diabetes has to do each day to maintain their insulin level.
    • And then we decided that we really should stop chatting at 11.00 pm so the host can get us out of their home...

    On a very sad note:
    We discussed the funeral arrangements for our dear friend and previous administrator and minute secretary - S. She was loved by many and will be so greatly missed. Our love and thoughts go to her husband, her daughter and their families.

    Ratings:

    Ratings range: 6.5 to 8.5

    Ratings average: 7.43

    Next book: The Time Traveller's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger

    Thank you to Domestic Goddess for compiling these minutes!

    Tuesday, 14 October 2008

    October book: In Defence of Food by Michael Pollan



    October book: In Defence of Food by Michael Pollan

    (chosen by Fairlie)


    Some background links to get you started:

    Tuesday, 30 September 2008

    Minutes September Book: Water for Elephants

    Minutes September Book: Water for Elephants


    by Sara Gruen


    (chosen by KM)


    KM chose this book on the recommendation of her GP who is also in a bookclub and often shares advice and feedback about book choices. She said that she had flown through this book and that it was a great read.


    Sara is a Canadian-born dual citizen (Canadian and American) who moved to the United States in 1999 for a technical writing job. When she was laid off two years later, instead of looking for another job, she started writing fiction full-time. She’s currently working on Ape House, her fourth novel.

    Sara lives with her husband, three children, two dogs, two cats, three goats, and horse in an environmentalist community.


    (biographical details sourced from the author's own website)


    What the publisher says about the book:


    A great, glorious, big-hearted novel set in a travelling circus touring the back blocks of America during the great depression of the early 1930s. It's a story of love and hate, trains and circuses, dwarves and fat ladies, horses and elephants - or, to be specific, one elephant, Rosie, star of the Benzini Bros Most Spectacular Show on Earth . . .

    What we discussed about the book:
    • The extent to which the detailed research of the depression era and circuses enhanced the atmosphere and experience of this book
    • The manner in which Sara Gruen wrote this book - she started with a very detailed outline
    • The inclusion of mini-plots and themes within the story -e.g prohibition, elderly care
    • Did Jacob have dementia?
    • What was the nature of August's mental state? How did we feel about his treatment of animals?
    • Was Walter the archetypal clown - happy smile, but so sad?
    • The careful observation of the dialogue between the working men. In what ways was this created by Gruen?
    • Were there parallels between this story and that of Jacob in the Bible?
    • The use of symbolism in the story - eg the crossover between Rosie/Rosemary...rosemary is the symbol for remembrance.
    • What did water represent throughout the book?
    • Was the ending credible? Could it only happen in a circus?
    Then we were sidetracked into:
    • The issue of homelessness during the Great Depression. What type of people became hobos? What were the circumstances that caused this?
    • Elderly care. Why are there not enough places? Is the standard of care offered adequate? How do we wish to be cared for when we are elderly?
    • Can elephants physically smile?
    • Do circuses still have animal performances?
    • Our own memories of childhood circuses: popcorn, sawdust, circus trucks, animals.
    • Why do clowns scare children?
    And in other news:
    • We discussed the paucity of good part-time jobs for mums returning to the workforce
    • We talked about night-nannies and sleep schools to train babies and toddlers to sleep through the night
    Ratings:

    Ratings range: 7 to 9.5
    Ratings average: 7.94

    Next book: In Defence of Food by Michael Pollan

    Thursday, 11 September 2008

    September book: Water for Elephants by Sara Gruen



    September book: Water for Elephants
    by Sara Gruen

    (chosen by KM)



    Some background links to get you started:

    Tuesday, 26 August 2008

    Minutes August book: The Mitford Girls by Mary S. Lovell

    August book: The Mitford Girls

    by Mary S. Lovell

    (chosen by T-Rex)



    T-Rex read The Mitford Girls when it was first published in 2003 and has recommended it to several friends. This time she wanted to choose a book that she had read and enjoyed rather than basing her choice on an unread recommendation.

    Mary S.Lovell was formerly an accountant and company director. She broke her back in a riding accident when she was 40 years old (1981) and wrote her first book while recovering. She continued to write in her spare time once she returned to work.

    Her biography of aviatrix Beryl Markham, Straight on Till Morning, was researched and written in under a year and became an immediate international bestseller. At this point, Lovell decided to retire from accountancy to write full time.

    The Mitford Girls (titled The Sisters in the USA) a biography of the celebrated Mitford sisters, was first published in September 2001 (paperback August 2002) and has been another international best-seller.

    Lovell is recognised for her intensive research methods and all her non-fiction books are extensively annotated.

    She regards herself as "a storyteller, rather than a literary writer. Everybody enjoys a good fast-paced story and that is what I try to write, only my stories are fact, not fiction. For me there is always an added frisson of enjoyment when I know that what I'm reading about actually occurred, and is not simply a figment of someone's imagination."

    She lives in the New Forest in Hampshire, England and is currently writing a family biography of the Churchills.

    (Biographical details sourced from the
    author's website)

    What the publisher says about the book:

    THE MITFORD GIRLS tells the true story behind the gaiety and frivolity of the six Mitford daughters - and the facts are as sensational as any novel: Nancy, whose right social existence masked an obsessional doomed love which soured her success; Pam, a countrywoman married to one of the best brains in Europe; Diana, an iconic beauty, who was already married when at 22 she fell in love with Oswald Moseley, the leader of the British fascists; Unity, who romantically in love with Hitler, became a member of his inner circle before shooting herself in the temple when WWII was declared; Jessica, the family rebel, who declared herself a communist in the schoolroom and the youngest sister, Debo, who became the Duchess of Devonshire.This is an extraordinary story of an extraordinary family, containing much new material, based on exclusive access to Mitford archives.

    What we discussed about the book:

    (apologies for brief nature of the minutes, your bookclub webmistress was absent from this meeting - thanks to Elster for forwarding through a few notes!)

    • How different each of the girls was
    • How political each of the girls was
    • The extent to which each of the girls was endowed with literary talent (one of the No.1 Ladies had read Love in a Cold Climate, but was disappointed with it)
    • The influence their mother had on the girls
    • Why would MI5 records indicate that they condidered Diana more 'dangerous' than Moseley?
    • The non-judgemental style in which the book is written - does the author offer any judgement, or are the facts laid out for the reader to make those decisions?

    Then we were sidetracked into:

    • Max Moseley's latest activities and the press coverage they have created
    • Examining some photos of Chatsworth - home of the only surviving sister (Debo, Duchess of Devonshire)

    Ratings:

    Initial ratings range: 7.5 to 8.5

    Initial ratings average: 8.0

    Post-discussion ratings: no change

    Next book: Water for Elephants by Sara Gruen

    Friday, 15 August 2008

    August book: The Mitford Girls by Mary S. Lovell


    August book: The Mitford Girls

    by Mary S. Lovell

    (chosen by T-Rex)


    Some background links to get you started:

    Wednesday, 16 July 2008

    Minutes July book: Love in the Time of Cholera by Gabriel Garcia Marquez

    Love in the Time of Cholera

    By Gabriel Garcia Marquez

    (chosen by Fairlie)



    As most of the No.1 Melbourne Bookclub Ladies know (because I tell them often enough) One Hundred Years of Solitude which is also by Gabriel Garcia Marquez still stands as my all-time favourite book. I hadn’t however, read anything else written by him, and had always meant to get around to reading Love in the Time of Cholera. My husband gave me a copy of it for Christmas so, motivated by the desire to read it and the fact it was sitting on my bedside table, I made it my bookclub choice.

    Gabriel García Márquez was born in March of 1927 in the tiny Colombian banana town of Aracataca. The following year, the banana economy took a downturn and created a rift in the town. As a result, his parents struggled financially and García Márquez was raised by his maternal grandparents.

    At the age of 19, he enrolled in the law program at the Universidad Nacional in Bogotá, but also had a passion for writing.

    García Márquez met the then 13-year-old Mercedes Barcha Pardo in his hometown when he was 18 and proposed to her soon after. They married fourteen years later, and their love has lasted a lifetime. While he traveled after dropping out of law school, she waited for him in Colombia until he returned for her when she was 27-years-old.

    García Márquez became a journalist after leaving law school and in 1954 he was sent to Rome on an assignment for his newspaper, and since then he has mostly lived abroad - in Paris, New York, Barcelona and Mexico – more or less in exile.

    One Hundred Years of Solitude was published in 1967, and within a week all 8000 copies of the original printing had been sold. It was translated into many languages and won the Chianchiano Prize in Italy, the Best Foreign Book in France, the Rómulo Gallegos Prize and the Nobel Prize for Literature.

    Love in the Time of Cholera was first published in 1982.

    (general biographical details from here)

    What the publisher says about the book:

    In their youth, Florentino Ariza and Fermina Daza fall passionately in love. When Fermina eventually chooses to marry a wealthy, well-born doctor, Florentino is devastated, but he is a romantic. As he rises in his business career he whiles away the years in 622 affairs--yet he reserves his heart for Fermina. Her husband dies at last, and Florentino purposefully attends the funeral. Fifty years, nine months, and four days after he first declared his love for Fermina, he will do so again.


    What we discussed about the book:

    • Why was cholera used as a device to reflect the properties of love?
    • What was the purpose of the emphasis on bodily functions, particularly in relation to Florentino?
    • In what way had Florentino “remained a virgin” for Fermina?
    • What was the nature of the relationship between Dr Urbino and Fermina – could it be described as love?
    • To what extent was Dr Urbino a modern man?
    • How many different types of love are portrayed in this book?
    • Is there a risk when reading a translation of a book written in another language that some significant subtlety may be lost? How does the fact that the Spanish words for cholera (el colera) and choler/anger (la colera) are so similar affect our understanding of the title of the book?
    • How did Garcia Marquez appeal to the senses in his descriptions. What effect did that have?
    • What would have happened after the last page? Would they have continued on the boat “forever”?
    • Why did we find Florentino such an unappealing character? In what ways does the steadfast pursuit of unrequited romantic love differ from obsessive stalking?
    • How did the decline and decay of the physical environment (e.g. the river) mirror the emotional content of the book?
    • How was magic realism employed in this novel?
    Then we were sidetracked into:

    • What are the possibilities of love developing within an arranged relationship?
    • In cases where Ladies were reading this book for the second time several years after the first reading - why were their impressions of it so different?
    • Is there a case for a book being ‘the right book at the right time’? Is this book interpreted differently by 20-something readers than it is by 40-somethings?
    • The different approaches various cultures have towards death, funerals, inheritances.

    And in other news, we discussed:

    • How gorgeous KM’s little boy is, when they paid us a surprise visit!
    • Why it is responsible to wear a helmet while skiing.
    • How various sayings in other languages do not translate directly into English – does for instance, “money open all tongues”? and do we “close the light”?
    • Is Apple the Chanel of the computer world?
    • Were record players (turntables) that stacked 5-6 vinyl LPs which dropped down as the one before finished, just as good as CD stackers in your carboot?

    Ratings:

    Initial rating range: we forgot to do initial ratings!
    Initial rating average: n/a
    Post-discussion range: 5.5 to 8.0
    Post-discussion average: 6.57


    Next book: The Mitford Girls by Mary S. Lovell (T-Rex’s choice)

    Saturday, 12 July 2008

    July book: Love in the Time of Cholera by Gabriel Garcia Marquez



    July book: Love in the Time of Cholera


    by Gabriel Garcia Marquez



    (chosen by Fairlie)


    Some background links to get you started:

    Friday, 11 July 2008

    Minutes June 2008 Book: The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas by John Boyne

    The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas

    by John Boyne

    (chosen by JM)



    JM was given this book as a birthday present, so figured she had to read it at some point and bookclub was as good a motivation as any. She had heard good feedback from other people that had read it and liked the size of the print!


    John Boyne is an Irish writer, born in Dublin in 1971. He studied at Trinity College Dublin and the University of East Anglia, Norwich and has published six novels, a short novella for charity, some short stories, book reviews, articles and interviews with other writers. He’s two Irish Book Awards, and the Bisto Book of the Year Award as well as being shortlisted for the British Book Award, and the Hennessy Award

    The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas spent 66 weeks at no.1 in Ireland and has been a bestseller in many countries. It’s sold more than 2.5 million copies worldwide, and has been made into a film.

    (general biographical details from John Boyne’s own website)

    What the publisher says about the book:

    A story of innocence existing within the most terrible evil, this is the fictional tale of two young boys caught up in events entirely beyond their control.

    Berlin 1942
    When Bruno returns home from school one day, he discovers that his belongings are being packed in crates. His father has received a promotion and the family must move from their home to a new house far far away, where there is no one to play with and nothing to do. A tall fence running alongside stretches as far as the eye can see and cuts him off from the strange people he can see in the distance.

    But Bruno longs to be an explorer and decides that there must be more to this desolate new place than meets the eye. While exploring his new environment, he meets another boy whose life and circumstances are very different to his own, and their meeting results in a friendship that has devastating consequences.

    What we discussed about the book:
    • How would children interpret the book? How would their understanding of it be different from adult readers?
    • What is a young adult? What age of child would this book be suitable for?
    • Was the naivety of Bruno credible?
    • Does this novel require a suspension of disbelief in order to fully appreciate the core of the story?
    • Is the book depressing or is it a celebration of friendship?
    • How was the friendship portrayed from each of the boy’s perspectives? What was the ‘value’ of the friendship to each of the boys? Was it a meeting of each other’s needs?
    • How did the father reconcile his work with his personal character? Was he a good father?
    • Did the mother have an affair with the Lieutenant? Is that idea too much a reflection of adult reading between the lines?
    • What did the ending mean? “Not in this day and age.” How does that apply to current world events?
    Then we were sidetracked into:
    • How exactly is pyjamas/pajamas spelled? Why did we have different versions on the books we had?
    • What makes a book a “young adult” book as opposed to an adult book?
    • How amazing it was that everyone present had actually finished the book. Was this a No.1 Melbourne Bookclub Ladies’ first?
    • What degree of violence is acceptable for children in various forms of media – e.g literature, DVDs, games? Is fantasy horror or violence more acceptable than portrayals of ‘real’ violence?
    • Did we see some similarities thematically between this book and The Kiterunner?
    And in other news, we discussed:
    • How many eggs could a chicken be expected to lay in a day? (Ed note: I googled it, and I believe those of us who said one or less a day are right!)
    • The value of getting your personal colours and style evaluated.
    • Babysitting clubs. How do they work?

    Ratings:

    Initial rating range: 5.5 to 10.0
    Initial rating average: 8.06
    Post-discussion range: 5.5 to 10.0
    Post-discussion average: 7.93


    Next book: Love in the Time of Cholera by Gabriel Garcia Marquez

    Tuesday, 10 June 2008

    June book: The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas by John Boyne

    The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas

    by John Boyne


    (chosen by JM)

    A few background links to get you started:

    Friday, 6 June 2008

    Minutes May 2008 Book: Notes from an Exhibition by Patrick Gale



    Notes from an Exhibition


    by Patrick Gale


    (chosen by KE)





    KE chose this book because with her nursing background, she was fascinated by the idea of a book about the effect of bipolar disorder on a family.


    Patrick Gale was born in 1962 on the Isle of Wight, where his father was a prison governor. He was the youngest of four children. The family moved to London, where his father ran Wandsworth Prison, then to Winchester.

    Patrick began boarding as a Winchester College Quirister at the cathedral choir school, Pilgrim’s, then went on to Winchester College. He has an English degree from New College, Oxford.

    He says he "has never had a grown-up job". His first two novels, The Aerodynamics of Pork and Ease were published in 1986. The following year he moved to Camelford near the north coast of Cornwall and now lives in the far west, on a farm near Land’s End.


    (general biographical details from here)


    What the publisher says about the book:

    When troubled artist Rachel Kelly dies painting obsessively in her attic studio in Penzance, her saintly husband and adult children have more than the usual mess to clear up. She leaves behind an extraordinary and acclaimed body of work – but she also leaves a legacy of secrets and emotional damage it will take months to unravel.

    A wondrous, monstrous creature, she exerts a power that outlives her. To her children she is both curse and blessing, though they all in one way or another reap her whirlwind, inheriting her waywardness, her power of loving – and her demons… Only their father's Quaker gifts of stillness and resilience give them any chance of withstanding her destructive influence and the suspicion that they came a poor second to the creation of her art.

    The reader becomes a detective, piecing together the clues of a life – as artist, lover, mother, wife and patient – which takes them from contemporary Penzance to 1960s Toronto to St Ives in the 1970s. What emerges is a story of enduring love, and of a family which weathers tragedy, mental illness and the intolerable strain of living with genius.

    Patrick Gale's latest novel shines with intelligence, humour and tenderness.


    What we discussed about the book:

    • Does Gale write 'like a woman'? Is that even a valid question to ask? How does a woman write? Is there such a thing as a 'woman's voice' in writing?
    • What was Antony's role in the family dynamic?
    • What we thought about the 'notes from an exhibition' which opened each chapter. What did they add to our understanding of the story? What was their purpose? Did they offer us clues to unravel the story?
    • Is mental illness a symptom of genius or a cause?
    • How did Rachel manage her obsession for art and her relationships family? Is it possible to have a passion for something and maintain a family life?
    • What was the significance of Petroc's death both to Rachel and to the rest of the family after her death?
    • Did Rachel try to control or to mentor Morwenna's artistic talent?
    • Was Rachel actually pregnant at the institution? Or was that a figment of her imagination?
    • The role of the Quaker religion in the book. Did its quiet and reflective nature act as a counter-point to the manic and hysterical nature of Rachel's life?
    • What frightened Rachel so much?

    Then we were sidetracked into:
    • The nature of bipolar disorder. Does it seem more prevalent nowadays? Or is it just that more people speak openly about it?
    • Were we attracted by the idea of the Quaker religion by its portrayal in this book?
    • Can a male author write female characters convincingly, and vice versa?
    • Do creative people see things a little differently to others? Is this a symptom of a mental illness, or just a different perspective?
    • Is it acceptable for people with bipolar disorder to choose not to take their meds in order to maintain a creative edge?
    • Are children more resilient than we give them credit for?

    And in other news, we discussed:

    • The health risks of a shared communion cup at church. And which churches use incense?
    • What influence do books have on your life? Are there any books that you have read and have changed your life? Are they fiction or non-fiction?


    Ratings:


    Initial rating range: 6.0 to 8.5
    Initial rating average: 7.1
    Post-discussion range: 6.0 to 8.5
    Post-discussion average: 6.9


    Next book: The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas by John Boyne

    Thursday, 15 May 2008

    May book: Notes from an Exhibition by Patrick Gale


    Notes from an Exhibition by Patrick Gale (chosen by KE)

    Meeting date: Tuesday 20th May
    Venue: Domestic Goddess's house









    Some links for background information to get you started:

    Thursday, 17 April 2008

    Minutes April 2008 Book: The Secret River by Kate Grenville

    The Secret River

    by Kate Grenville

    (chosen by Elster)



    Elster chose this book on the recommendation of her neighbour. She read it last year and enjoyed it, so decided to choose it for bookclub.

    Kate Grenville was born and currently lives in Sydney. She has an Arts degree from Sydney University and worked in the film industry before living in the UK and Europe for several years and starting to write.

    She completed an MA in Creative Writing at the University of Colorado in 1980 and when she returned to Australia in 1983 she worked at the Subtitling Unit for SBS Television. Her first book, a collection of stories - Bearded Ladies - was published in 1984, and since then she's published six novels and four books about the writing process (one co-written with Sue Woolfe).

    The Secret River has won many prizes, including the Commonwealth Prize for Literature and the Christina Stead Prize. Her other works of fiction have also won state and national awards. The Idea of Perfection won the Orange Prize. Her most recent book Searching for the Secret River is a memoir about the writing of The Secret River. It tells the story of the research behind the novel.

    Kate Grenville's novels have been published in a number of countries, including in translation, and her books about the writing process are used in many creative writing courses.

    (general biographical details from Kate Grenville's own website.)

    What the publisher says about The Secret River:

    In the early nineteenth century William Thornhill is transported from the slums of London to New South Wales for the term of his natural life. He arrives with his wife Sal and their children in a harsh land he cannot understand.

    Eight years later, Thornhill sails up the Hawkesbury as a free man to claim a hundred acres. Aboriginal people already live on that river and Thornhill will soon have to make the most difficult decision of his life.

    Inspired by research into her own family history, Kate Grenville's The Secret River is a tour de force, a powerful and groundbreaking story about life on the frontier.


    What we discussed about the book:

    • To what extent did we empathise with the main characters?
    • How harshly did we judge their actions, particularly the indigenous relations. Were we able to experience the story without viewing it from a 21st century perspective?
    • How would we have behaved faced with the same situations as the characters? Could we have coped with frontier life in the way that Sal did?
    • In relation to the various examples of mistreatment of the Aboriginal people, what alternative courses of action may have been available to the settlers? Could William have informed authorities about the woman chained up? What would the implications of that course of action have been?
    • Did the flaws in William's character make it easier or harder for us to empathise with him?
    • The symbolism of the fish carved into the rock above the Thornhill's land. Was the placement of his large permanent house over the fish an attempt to wipe out the memory, or a reminder that no matter what was put on top of it, the land had always been someone else's first?
    • Why didn't the settlers learn from the Aborigines with regard to hunting and gathering food? What was the cultural mindset at the time that caused them to dismiss such obvious survival mechanisms as 'savage'?
    • The difficulties of communication between two societies that didn't share a language or cultural references. Were there differences in understanding of body language too? What examples were there of attempts to communicate being misinterpreted?
    • To what extent the convicts were victims of a rigid British class structure. Did we judge them less harshly than the authorities?
    • Was Sal representative of most settler women? Her stoic endurance of fearful and hard conditions made her an admirable character. How did we view the relationship between her and William?
    • How did the evocative, descriptive writing style heighten our experience of this book?

    Then we were sidetracked into:

    • What role does historical fiction play in the representation of history? What responsibility does an historical fiction writer have to get the facts right?
    • Is it possible to empathise with a character whose actions you find abhorrent?
    • If hypothetical aliens arrived in our world, and we shared no language, cultural references or perhaps even body language, how would we communicate with them? Would our immediate response be one of repelling the invader? Or how would we communicate our welcome? How would we know whether they came in peace?
    And in other news, we discussed:

    • Mobile phones. Is it possible to get one which just makes and receives calls and has no extra features we don't need?
    • Acceptance of cultural and religious rules passed down through generations. Which ones do we follow blindly because we've always done it, which ones do we question?
    Ratings:
    Initial rating average: 8.4
    Initial rating range: 7.5 to 9.5
    End of discussion ratings: no change

    * Next month, the initial rating will be a silent rating.

    Next book: Notes from an Exhibition by Patrick Gale

    Wednesday, 9 April 2008

    April book: The Secret River by Kate Grenville

    The Secret River by Kate Grenville
    (chosen by Elster)

    Meeting date: Tuesday 15th April
    Venue: Fairlie's house




    Some links for background information to get you started:

    Minutes March 2008 Book: What is the What by Dave Eggers



    What is the What

    by Dave Eggers

    (chosen by CH)

    CH chose this book on a recommendation from another bookclub which had given it a really high rating. She was told it was an "important book" with a really significant story which needs to be told. This appealed to CH, as she felt that the issue of the Sudan is difficult to understand and engage with, and the personal story provides a bridge into it.

    Dave Eggers was born in 1970 in Boston, Massachusetts and attended the University of Illinois. He is married to writer, Vendela Vida and they live in San Francisco with their daughter, born in 2005.

    Eggers began writing as a Salon.com editor. His first book was a memoir, A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius (2000). It is about the author's struggle to raise his younger brother following the sudden deaths of their parents.

    In 2002, Eggers published his first novel, You Shall Know Our Velocity. What Is the What: The Autobiography of Valentino Achak Deng is his second novel and it was a finalist for the 2006 National Book Critics Circle Award for Fiction.

    Eggers is a founder of McSweeney's, an independent publishing house and currently teaches writing in San Francisco at a nonprofit tutoring centre and writing school for children that he co-founded with Vendela Vida in 2002. They have expanded the program by using volunteers to operate similar centres in Los Angeles, New York City, Seattle, Chicago, and Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    (General biographical details from here)

    The publisher's comments:

    Separated from his family, Valentino Achak Deng becomes a refugee in war-ravaged southern Sudan. His travels bring him in contact with enemy soldiers, with liberation rebels, with hyenas and lions, with disease and starvation, and with deadly murahaleen (militias on horseback)—the same sort who currently terrorize Darfur. Based closely on actual experiences, What Is the What is heartrending and astonishing, filled with adventure, suspense, tragedy, and, finally, triumph.

    What we discussed about the book:

    • How does this book portray hope as the primary driver of the human condition?
    • In what ways was Deng a charismatic character?
    • Is telling the story a healing process for Deng?
    • The Sudanese story of evolution - the cow or the what? What is the what? What is the cow? Does our society value the what over the cow?
    • The level of violence shown in the refugee camps, particularly towards women.
    • The flow of the narrative. In what ways did the jumping between past and present effect the telling of the story?
    • Was the book too long?
    • Was the font too small?

    Then we were sidetracked into:

    • When a society experiences a total disregard for human life, how does it begin to rebuild? In what ways is 'civilisation' nurtured?
    • The idea that many children in the world today still grow up not knowing much about the world beyond their village. How does a lack of outside influences affect a society?

    And in other news, we discussed:

    • Branded foods for kids in supermarkets. Is it right that food choices may be made on the basis of which superhero is on the packet rather than on its nutritional, economic and environmental impact. Should we just vote with our feet?
    • The politics of food choices. Do we consume way more than we really need to? And is too much of it over-packaged and over-refined? Fascinating photos of the weekly groceries for families around the world can be found here.
    • Packaging in school lunches. How can we minimise the plastic wrapping going to school each day?
    • The Uplift Fiji bra donation program. Which, of course, led us to...water-filled bras vs chicken fillets. Which is more natural looking?

    Ratings

    Initial rating average: 7.08

    Initial rating range: 5 to 9

    End of discussion rating average: 7.25

    End of discussion rating range: 6 to 9

    Next book: The Secret River by Kate Grenville (Elster's choice)

    Friday, 29 February 2008

    March book: What is the What by Dave Eggers



    What is the What by Dave Eggers (chosen by CH)
    Meeting date: March 18th
    Venue: Gypsy's house






    Some links for background information to get you started:

    Review of book on ABC Radio National

    New York Magazine book review

    Dave Eggers entry in Wikipedia

    Dave Eggers reading from What is the What on Youtube

    Minutes Febuary 2008 Book: The Road by Cormac McCarthy



    The Road
    by Cormac McCarthy
    (chosen by Gypsy)









    Gypsy first read The Road last year and although she found it a good read, thought it was dark, dismal and depressing. When it came time to chose her bookclub book for this year, she read about two dozen books in a period of three weeks to pick just the perfect one. But to her dismay, none of them seemed ‘quite right’. In desperation, she remembered The Road and thought it would offer interesting fodder for discussion. Hence her choice.

    Cormac McCarthy was born in 1933 in Providence, Rhode Island, and moved with his family to Knoxville, Tennessee, in 1937. He entered the University of Tennessee in 1951-1952 and was a liberal arts major.

    In 1953, he joined the United States Air Force for four years and in 1957, he returned to the University of Tennessee. In 1961, he married fellow university student Lee Holleman and their son Cullen was born. He left university without getting a degree and moved to Chicago where he wrote his first novel. His marriage to Lee Holleman ended.

    McCarthy's first novel, The Orchard Keeper, was published by Random House in 1965.
    While on the ship traveling to Ireland in 1965, he met Anne DeLisle, who was a singer on the ship. He married her in England in 1966, and separated from her in 1976.

    McCarthy now lives in the Tesuque, New Mexico, area, north of Santa Fe, with his third wife, Jennifer Winkley, and their son, John. He is a very private person and rarely grants interviews.

    He has now had ten novels published.

    Oprah Winfrey chose The Road as the April 2007 selection for her Book Club. McCarthy agreed to do his first ever television interview with her on The Oprah Winfrey Show. During the interview he told of the outright poverty he experienced at times during his career as a writer. He also spoke about raising a child at an advanced age, and how his eight-year-old son was the inspiration for The Road.

    (general biographical details from here)

    Description of The Road from Random House website:


    A searing, postapocalyptic novel destined to become Cormac McCarthy’s masterpiece.

    A father and his son walk alone through burned America. Nothing moves in the ravaged landscape save the ash on the wind. It is cold enough to crack stones, and when the snow falls it is gray. The sky is dark. Their destination is the coast, although they don’t know what, if anything, awaits them there. They have nothing; just a pistol to defend themselves against the lawless bands that stalk the road, the clothes they are wearing, a cart of scavenged food—and each other.

    The Road is the profoundly moving story of a journey. It boldly imagines a future in which no hope remains, but in which the father and his son, “each the other’s world entire,” are sustained by love. Awesome in the totality of its vision, it is an unflinching meditation on the worst and the best that we are capable of: ultimate destructiveness, desperate tenacity, and the tenderness that keeps two people alive in the face of total devastation.


    What we discussed about the book:

    • What was the cataclysmic event that had happened? Was it a nuclear war, global warming, mass-terrorism, meteor impact…? Does it matter to our reading of the novel? As readers, were we able to dull our curiosity for prior events to focus on the current story of the road?
    • To what extent is hope a motivator of the characters?
    • The ‘fire’ that the man refers to – what was it? Humanity? Hope? Continuity of the human race?
    • The extent to which the language used in dialogue was sparse and minimal.
    • The sense of colour (or lack of) throughout the book. In what ways did McCarthy create the greyness of the landscape? Do humans lose perception of colour when traumatized?
    • Was the mother’s choice selfish or selfless?
    • Were there parallels between the boy and Jesus?
    • To what extent will faith and hope endure in the face of desolation and destruction?
    • Is the greatest fear of a parent that of not being able to care for and protect their child until they are grown up?
    • To what extent did the man die with the guilt of abandoning the boy?
    • Were the characters left nameless (The man and the boy) in order to create an everyman experience for the reader?
    • To what extent did we empathise with the characters?


    Then we were sidetracked into:

    • How visual images of horror lock into your brain/memory. Is this process different between men and women?
    • What is the core of humanity? Is it love, ceremony and survival?


    And in other news, we discussed:

    • RR’s upcoming trip to Egypt. The rest of us were VERY jealous.
    • How well S went with her craniotomy and we all pass on our best wishes, prayers, happy thoughts (tick as appropriate) for the next stage of her treatment.
    • Sleep schools and sleep Nazis. We decided we were the perfect group to advice new mothers on babies sleeping as we had all failed Sleep 101 the first (and in some cases second) time around.
    • KE’s scary experience of discovering a burglar in her home and chasing him out of the house.
    • How Domestic Goddess discovered that a gift voucher for ‘XXXX waxing’ was not one which offered her four lots of half-leg waxing!

    Ratings

    We introduced a new system where books are rated straight up at the start of the discussion and then again at the end.

    Initial rating
    Average: 9.0
    Range: 7.5 to 10

    End of discussion rating
    Average: 9.0
    Range: 7.5 to 10


    Next book: What is the What by Dave Eggers (CH’s choice)

    Thursday, 28 February 2008

    New bookclub bub!

    The No.1 Melbourne Ladies' Bookclub
    congratulates JM and her hubby
    on the arrival of their third son
    on Wednesday 27th February.
    8lbs 8oz.
    All doing well.

    Tuesday, 19 February 2008

    February book: The Road by Cormac McCarthy



    The Road
    by Cormac McCarthy
    (chosen by Gypsy)

    Meeting date: February 19th
    Venue: CH's house






    Some links for background information to get you started:

    2007 book choices

    What we read in 2007:

    The Gospel of Gods and Crocodiles by Elizabeth Stead

    Theft: A Love Story by Peter Carey

    Suite Francaise by Irene Nemirovsky

    The Women's Room by Marilyn French

    The Book Thief by Markus Zusak

    Interview with a Vampire by Anne Rice

    The Memory Keeper’s Daughter by Kim Edwards

    The Unknown Terrorist by Richard Flanagan

    In the Name of Honour by Mukhtar Mai

    Shalimar the Clown by Salman Rushdie

    Minutes November 2007 Book: The Gospel of Gods and Crocodiles



    The Gospel of Gods and Crocodiles by Elizabeth Stead
    (chosen by TeamSAK)






    Apologies for the scant and tardy minutes...blame a long, hot summer holiday and a bad memory! Anyhow, for the record, here are the ratings:

    Ratings

    Average: 7.33
    Range: 6.5 to 8.5

    Next book: The Road by Cormac McCarthy